I shall have to find time to read that.

I think was mentioned earlier, but maybe it was in another thread, in short you can't. I am convinced that it is due to the close proximity of the two runways. There are some land bases that also have this problem. Several people have spent months trying to get that to work. For now, with the state ...

Ahhh Germany! From the time that we probably had more aircraft based other there than we currently do over here.

Just download the portableapps version. That is what I use.

There isn't enough info there for me to make a call. However, what I would say is try renaming your user.config to see if that cures something. If you use something like Everything to search then find "4.3.4.0" and rename the user.config inside. If you don't have Everything, firstly why?, ...

I am only going by what they say on their website, Gary. So I am not sure - No. It could well be that they don't bother to keep the website up to date for spotters.

G-HHAA is currently at Leeming.

... and always!

I will try to explain some of the things to take into account, and this will deal only with the take off. Firstly you have to deal with the acceleration off the deck, it has to take off shorter. More power is the obvious thing, and as John says this can be used in conjunction with lower weight but i...

Well again I put forward the idea of going with what you know works. You have said that you can't get reality so really you have to go with basics to ensure it works. My gut feeling is that al least some of your issues are caused by the parallel taxiways being in close proximity. You can't have airc...

Is that another one coming into land? You can't have that happen. To my mind that runway is too short. The aircraft should not turn onto the runway direction/runway if the approach is not clear. Which they will do because there is no hold short node stopping them. If you put the hold short nodes on ...

Have you ATC set for your afcad?. I think that this is a must for aircraft to behave properly. The other thing is that you describe the problem but there are no pics so we are kinda guessing as to where the issue occurs. My personal thought is that the hold short node is too close to the runway node...

The runway on a carrier is no different to a conventional runway you must have a hold short node before the runway node with the markings pointing in the direction of the runway.

LOL! I think that you could probably rule out the possibility of us keeping that a secret.

Jorgen,
That was the way that Greg suggested was best and therefore that is the way that we are going.

Got to be worth a try.

I just took a look at your afcad again. Have you got the taxi arrows going the wrong way in the bow? Could this be the issue? When you say the wrong direction? Should the arrows be pointing toward the parking spots or? As far as I am aware the arrows point in the direction of travel. For FS9 this w...

I just took a look at your afcad again.
Have you got the taxi arrows going the wrong way in the bow? Could this be the issue?

Not really. With everything removed except for the pieces that the C-2/E-2 would touch should work UNLESS there is a problem with the system that you have designed. This is about proving that this part works. Hopefully it will. This would indicate that things like bounding boxes could come into play...

That says that it is more of a generic thing than you first thought, however the test could reveal the problem.

OK I am having to guess here as I don't have P3D. Now sometimes you need to simplify things to see a problem. What I would suggest is taking a copy of your afcad and keeping it safe. Then remove everything EXCEPT what the E-2/C-2s should use. So just their parking and their taxi ways and runways. Th...